Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are seen in this image released by the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., U.S., on December 19, 2025 as part of a new trove of documents from its investigations into the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. U.S. Justice Department/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY THIS PICTURE WAS PROCESSED BY REUTERS TO ENHANCE QUALITY. AN UNPROCESSED VERSION HAS BEEN PROVIDED SEPARATELY.
(New York, New York) – A document released by the U.S. Department of Justice as part of the Epstein files includes a disturbing, unverified claim alleging that two young women were killed and buried at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and an associate identified as “Madam G,” a reference commonly understood to mean Ghislaine Maxwell.
The allegation appears in what is described as an email written by a former staff member at a property referred to as “the Zorro.” In the message, the writer states that the information is sensitive and urges discretion, saying the material was taken from Epstein’s home and retained as “insurance” in the event of future litigation. The author claims firsthand knowledge of the events, writing that they had “been there and seen it all.”
The document asserts that the two individuals died during violent sexual encounters and were later buried in hills outside the property, allegedly on Epstein’s orders. No evidence accompanying the claim is provided in the file, and the allegations have not been adjudicated or independently verified.
The DOJ has not commented publicly on the specific allegation, and it remains unclear why the document was retained or how it was evaluated by investigators. Epstein died in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Maxwell was later convicted on multiple counts related to the trafficking and abuse of minors.
The document underscores the scope and severity of claims that continue to surface in connection with Epstein, even years after his death. As with other materials included in the DOJ release, the contents reflect allegations and statements collected during investigations, not findings of fact.
Editor’s note:
The claim described above is unproven and is presented as it appears within a DOJ-released file. Readers are advised to exercise discretion.
